France To Implement "Right of the Soil" Immigration and citizenship Regulatory Bill

The upcoming review of the controversial French immigration bill by the country’s Constitutional Council has intensified the debate surrounding President Emmanuel Macron's proposed legislation, which has elicited widespread public protests and political discord.

READ ALSO: Somalia Rejects Government Negotiation With Ethiopia Over Somaliland Port Contract

Following its passage by the National Assembly with a vote of 349 to 186, the bill sparked demonstrations, drawing tens of thousands onto the streets, with critics alleging its alignment with far-right ideologies. Notably, 27 members from Macron’s coalition voted against the bill, and an additional 32 abstained, underscoring the internal rift within the governing body. The resignation of French Health Minister Aurelien Rousseau in protest further underscored the divisiveness of the legislation.

The bill proposes amendments related to residency, citizenship, and includes stringent measures aimed at bolstering a tougher immigration stance. These measures encompass restricting the reunification of families within France and imposing stricter regulations on welfare access. 

Notably, the bill also aims to alter the process through which children born in France to foreign parents attain citizenship, requiring them to apply between the ages of 16 and 18, departing from the previous automatic citizenship acquisition under jus soli, or "right of the soil" policy.

Critics of the bill have accused Macron of capitulating to far-right leanings, a sentiment echoed by far-right politician Marine Le Pen, who endorsed the bill following its passage.

READ ALSO: Supreme Court Orders Border Patrol Agents To Cut Razor Wire Fence on Texas-Mexico Border

Looking ahead, the Constitutional Council's assessment of Macron's legislation is poised to generate significant political ramifications. While it is anticipated that certain elements of the bill will endure, any potential declaration of unconstitutionality by the council could prompt the government to either accept the decision or revisit the bill for necessary revisions.

With Macron acknowledging the bill's compromises and imperfections, the council's ruling is poised to inject substantial political drama into the legislative landscape. The potential gravity of the council's decision is not lost on Macron, as any substantial reprimand of the legislation would be considered a significant setback for the president.

Source: aljazeera


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

AFCON 2023: Cape Verde Beats Ghana To Top Group B

Former US Officials Reaffirm Strong Support for Taiwan Following Presidential Election

Parliament Summons Transport Minister Over Extra $20 Charge at KIA